• Paranormalia is written by Robert McLuhan, a journalist and author based in London. Please contact me at robertmcluhan@gmail.com

Search

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

More...

« The Spiritualization of Science | Main | St Paul's Protest »

October 27, 2011

Nicholls vs Randi

There's an interesting interview here with Graham Nicholls, who writes about out-of-body experiences. I've yet to read Graham's book, Avenues of the Human Spirit, but it definitely looks worth checking out.

The interview got a comment from James Randi, who wonders why parapsychologists like Radin and Sheldrake are not queueing up to take the Million Dollar Challenge. Graham explains why...

Posted at 09:41 AM in general |

| | | | |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6d8553ef0154367131de970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nicholls vs Randi:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I thought Nicholls spoke quite well and had a very cogent explanation for the lack of legitimacy of Randi's prize (the actual prize, not the book) and for why respected researchers would avoid it.

Posted by: Robert Perry | October 28, 2011 at 06:42 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

ORDER ONLINE!

PAPERBACK

KINDLE

  • SOME REVIEWER COMMENTS
  • ‘A brisk, bracing look at this continuing controversy, exhaustively researched .. a must-read for anyone with a serious interest in parapsychology and its critics.’‘
  • ‘‘Packed with accurate information while at the same time surprisingly engaging and fun to read.’‘
  • ‘‘This is one book that gives a completely objective review of skeptical debunking, and spells out in detail a clear pattern of chicanery which pervades a well-funded and organized campaign against all psi research.’‘
Subscribe to this blog's feed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Links

RESOURCES

  • ‘These disturbing phenomena seem to deny all our usual scientific ideas. How we should like to discredit them! Unfortunately the statistical evidence, at least for telepathy, is overwhelming. It is very difficult to rearrange one’s ideas so as to fit these new facts in.’ Alan Turing, computer scientist.

  • ‘I have noticed that if a small group of intelligent people, not supposed to be impressed by psychic research, get together and such matters are mentioned, and all feel that they are in safe and sane company, usually from a third to a half of them begin to relate exceptions. That is to say, each opens a little residual closet and takes out some incident which happened to them or to some member of their family, or to some friend whom they trust and which they think odd and extremely puzzling.’ Walter Prince, psychic researcher.

  • When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong. Arthur C. Clarke

  • ‘Science seems to me to teach in the highest and strongest manner the great truth which is embodied in the Christian conception of entire surrender to the will of God. Sit down before fact as a little child, be prepared to give up every preconceived notion, follow humbly wherever and to whatever abysses nature leads, or you shall learn nothing.’ Thomas Henry Huxley

  • We can always immunize a theory against refutation. There are many such immunizing tactics; and if nothing better occurs to us, we can always deny the objectivity – or even the existence – of the refuting observation. Those intellectuals who are more interested in being right than in learning something interesting but unexpected are by no means rare exceptions. Karl Popper, on the defenders of materialism.

  • If we have learned one thing from the history of invention and discovery, it is that, in the long run - and often in the short one - the most daring prophecies seem laughably conservative. Arthur C. Clarke.

Become a Fan